This Oz film is a prequel to the original Wizard of Oz. Being made today, it’s packed with cutting edge CG effects that create the world of Oz and lead the audience through the tale of how Oz became The Wizard of Oz.

It’s a pretty good story with some outstanding visual effects! I can’t shake the view that it’s uneven film from start to finish though. For every good piece, there’s a bad or at the very least a misaligned one. The cast is good, (Michelle Williams doing the best work I think) but the performances suffer from some really awkward dialog and delivery. I blame the writing more as the actor(s) are really just working with what they are given. It takes place in 1905, but there is a lot of weird, contemporary, aggressive/edgy lines that just sound forced and don’t fit (Knuck is the biggest offender, I’m not sure what the writers were going for).

The story fits well, but the movie is a bit long in the tooth. Two hours and fifteen minutes is a long time for this kind of tale. I felt like the end was far and away the most cohesive and best paced (it had the best ideas and follow through with some amazing special effects). The beginning is good as we watch as Oz gets to the land of Oz the same way Dorothy does and understand what kind of man he is. He’s a bit of a cheat, but he is a good person at the core. He meets all sorts of colorful characters (really great work on Finley and China Girl, fantastic animation and detail) and Oz really pops as a fantasy place. The middle is very rocky. The set up for The Wicked Witch to become Wicked is my biggest complaint. It’s stupid and isn’t good enough to have a character become a heel. Yes she’s tricked, but the trick was so vapid and simple that it’s too unbelievable to take seriously. There’s a better way to do it; some restructuring could have gone long way and it isn’t like they were pressed for runtime at over two hours. She looks fantastic though (the costumes are fantastic and the sound design is outstanding as well)!

It’s a striking move visually, there is a lot of camera movement. There are a lot of Raimi tells (especially during action scenes that involve witches). No complaints on the production front from me.

The Great and Powerful is a fun movie, it is PG and there are some visuals that I think could freak out a younger (less than 6) child. I wasn’t too sure what to expected but I came away with mostly positive vibes from it. I think it’s a better movie than Tim Burton’s Alice in Wonderland.

Great documentary recently hit Netflix Instant. Side by Side did its rounds on the film fest circuit, got a great response and is now easy to see for everyone.

It’s a discussion on the warp speed that digital film making is over taking traditional celluloid film and techniques (many Cinematographers feel threatened). Film stock has been in use for more than 100 years and it’s only been about 13 years since digital has hit the professional scene to slowly claw it’s way into favor. In fact. traditional film cameras stopped being manufactured in 2011.

This is really a story of the inevitable. Digital was vastly inferior to film, but that is quickly changing. Equipment and workflow is changing to almost all digital, with many cost, speed and versatility for production benefits. There’s a few steadfast film makers who are holding on to film and Side by Side gets their side as well as the more forward thinkers. It’s an even movie where the pros and cons of each side are given equal time and consideration. While the conclusion seems pretty clear to anyone right at the start, this docu is a great history lesson with some fantastic interviews from some of the biggest names in cinema. A must watch for movie buffs.

It’s been awhile since I’ve seen a cop movie, so it was nice to visit the genre again. End of Watch is the story of two young Los Angles cops on the beat. Following them for about a year, Brian and Mike are not only partners on the force, but really good friends. Through their everyday job the stumble upon a very deep rooted and dangerous criminal organization that does not want anyone disturbing their business.

End of Watch is shot documentary style and that’s my biggest problem with it. There’s no need for it as the filmmakers didn’t stick with the idea. It’s set up so that Brian is going to school on the side and one of his electives is a film class, so he has a hand held camera and two cameras that he has pinned to the chest of himself and Mike. So that’s where most of the footage you see “comes” from. Sometimes other people have cameras too, like a gang banger sitting in the back of a car on their way to a drive by. But throughout the movie, you see camera angles that don’t fit this set up. Cameras disappear and come back, traditional steady cam shots are used in chases…it doesn’t make much sense to me. A few lines of dialog are said to explain the video camera footage, but what for? It wasn’t used and there was no benefit to it. I might be over reacting, but it stuck out to me for the entire film.

Aside from that, I thought it was a great movie. I’ve heard a lot of grandiose praise for this flick which I think is a bit much, but it’s defiantly worth a watch. I like Jake Gyllenhaal a lot and he’s got great chemistry with Michael Pena. It’s well made all around, the banter between the two leads is fun even if there are a few dips into douchey bro cop territory.

Good times, I recommend it.

Part 2 was just released and looking back, I don’t think I talked about the first one!

Put simply, TDKR is one of the cornerstones of Batman lore. Written by Mark Miller and released in 1985 , Returns takes place 10 years after Bruce Wayne has hung up the cowl. Gotham is over run by gangs, the worst of humanity is eating the city from the inside. A weathered Bruce Wayne decides he can’t sit by any longer. Old foes re-emerge along with The Bat and the authorities are none to happy about any of it.

Returns has everything that makes Batman a fan favorite. Intensity, brains, brawn and honor. Even long past his physical prime, Bruce Wayne is a force of nature than no one can match. Having just watched Part 2, it’s the freshest in my mind. It is the strongest of the two with the stakes at the highest. Joker comes out of retirement and the carnage is legendary. The fight he and Batman have is the stuff of legend, and the dialog! Just dripping with brilliance (fantastic voice acting from everyone). The set up and follow through for every piece of this tale are just some of the best story telling around. The battle with Superman? Get outta here! Just tantalizing and euphoric action. Batman is the definition of bad ass.

Warner Brothers takes a lot of pride in their properties and they let this production team go to make the best Batman they could. The animation is fantastic (I can think of only one quick action that was really awful) and the soundtrack is simply epic in scope and scale.

The Chris Nolan pulled a lot of things from this source (and Year One for Batman Begins) and while there is a lot of questionable decisions in those movies for fans, Returns can be called the uncut Batman. The power and awe of one of America’s favorite heroes. Let me be clear; this is a story that is for adults. There’s a lot of grown up stuff in here in theme and violence. I’ve glossed over a lot of the details, if you’ve never read the book it’ll be a whole new world and fans can be assured that it does the source material justice.

Arguably perfect.

Seth MacFarlane successfully parlays his TV career to film with Ted, a fun story about two long time friends. One being Mark Walberg, the other a teddy bear come to life.

Ted holds a lot of ties to Family Guy, with a lot of the same cast and a similar sense of humor. There’s not as much “cut away to random act” for laughs and there are zero show tunes which probably explain how this movie did so well (half a billion world wide). It’s a good story that’s held together with great and funny characters. The idea is goofy but the filmmakers know this, acknowledge it and make it work. The CG effects that bring Ted alive onscreen is also a huge factor. He looks like a real character interacting with real people in the real world which can’t be understated at how important that is. If he looked fake it would have been distacting and taken a lot away from the movie since he’s in almost every shot. There’s a handful of weird looking parts where he doesn’t match the lighting in the room, but on the whole he’s really impressive.

I’m a fan of Seth MacFarlane for the most part, some of his shtick is dumb, but there is some hilarious stuff in this movie. It’s not gross out humor, but there is plenty of cursing, insults, sex and drug humor. Some of it is played out, some of it hits the mark. It’s one of the better comedies I’ve seen and even outside of that, it’s a great movie. It won’t appeal to everyone, but those people probably aren’t much fun to be around anyway.

The art of stop motion animation! True beauty in motion. I’m a big fan of the art form and the animation in ParaNorman is just eye popping.

Norman is a 11 year old who is special. He can see ghosts. His grandmother floats about the house and talks to him, much to the dismay of Norman’s father. “It’s one thing to be weird around your family, but in front of the whole town!?” Norman is an outcast, a loner, no one understands him. Except for Neil, who is also picked on and just won’t stop trying to be friends. Neil is the first out stretched hand to Norman.

With Norman’s gift, he’s given the task of saving the town from a 300 year old witch’s curse. She is going to raise the dead and Norman is the only one who can stop it. It’s a spooky and funny adventure that walks the line of horror and children’s story. There’s a certain amount of Ronald Dahl and Tim Burton approach to complex themes and visuals.

It can get pretty intense for younger viewers, but there is a really good story and message (bullies, stereotypes, judging others based on how they look) in ParaNorman. I’d say a kid 10 or older wouldn’t be freaked out and would really enjoy the ride. There’s some creepy moments followed by some good laughs, I’m really impressed at how well this movie walks a very precarious line. The animation really sells the tone of the movie.

Highly recommended.

I consider myself a casual Lord of the Rings fan. I watched all the movies and thought they were good, I tried to read the novels and was bored out of my mind. I took to the technical achievements of the films, all the new techniques and the immense work that Peter Jackson and his team did are very impressive. I like Peter Jackson as a director. It’s taken a very long time for the prequel to the LotR trilogy to be made, but The Hobbit is finally here.

I never read the book and knew the basics going into the film. I went to a full Peter Jackson Experience showing to see the movie as PJ intended. That means High Frame Rate 3D. First, the story. It’s a bit more kid friendly than the trilogy, showing us the tale of Bilbo Baggins on his first adventure. He is picked by Gandalf the wizard to go on a journey with 14 Dwarves who are on a quest to reclaim their ancicestral home. There’s some funny jokes, some great characters with visuals and an orchestrated score to match the epic journey. The cast is great and despite a long run time of two hours and 40 minutes, I enjoyed it a lot. I didn’t know any of what was added or changed from the book, so I have nothing to be annoyed about. The pacing felt good, it always felt like the story was progressing.

Now the technical. There’s a lot of cogs and gears that need to spin perfectly together to make everything work just right with the 3D and High Frame Rate. When it all works, the film looks amazing. The brightest 3D picture I’ve ever seen and never blurred or turned into mud when things got face paced. The 48fps makes things look really weird. The picture is so clear and so smooth, I can’t really compair it to anything else I’ve seen. No movie or TV show looks like this. It’s very disctracting at the beginning. Bilbo looks like he’s running around sped up and camera movement looks turbo charged. Like the rig is on a greased up track with no friction, it just flies around. The lighting, the colors and the depth can make scenes look like you are looking through a View Master. It’s almost like going on a motion simulator ride like Star Tours or The Amazing Spiderman, it’s like a different level of visual fidelity to take in. The computer effects are mostly spectacular. There are some weird integration/composotomg issues here and there where characters don’t look like they are actually interacting with the ground. Instead of running, it looks like a video game glide. Gandalf’s nose looks very fake in the beginning, some weird lighting on the prothstetic I think. Those are my only realy complaints. The facial animation is fantastic and the scene with Gollum and Bilbo is a remarkable moment for cinema.

Taken as just a standard 2D movie, I think there is a lot to like here. LotR fans have no reason not to see this. A return to Middle Earth is a much stronger selling point than I ever thought. The new filming techniques are a worthy experiement I think. It needs more work, but I there is potential there. There’s two more movies for PJ to improve on and it’ll be interesting to see if he sucseeds.

You gotta love a good documentary. They’re entertaining, intriguing and educational. With the economy being on everyone’s mind for the past 10 years or so, The Queen of Versailles is an interesting look from the other side of the fence, the uber wealthy.

The filmmakers started following David and Jaqueline Siegel before the 2008 economic collapse. They are extremely wealthy. Twenty bathrooms in your house wealthy. David started Westgate time shares many years ago building a empire of 28 resorts around the country and a massive casino/hotel in Vegas. They live extravagantly and even with a 25.000+ square foot mansion, they need more space. They employ 19 people just for the house, they have 7 children under the age of 12 (and one who is a bit older, who they adopt from Jackie’s sister). They start to build Versailles, they 90,000 square foot dream home in Orlando.

Then the housing market and economy collapses in 2008. The Siegel’s get cut off at the knees.

It’s a fascinating look at what the US is now built on. It’s really easy to think these two are terrible people, they’re wealth is the kind that most people can’t even dream of. The can get any thing and everything they could ever want. They have deep social and political connections. It’s easy to be envious of what they have. But this docu does a really good job of showing both sides of the story. They’re both people. David worked and works his ass off for what he has. He never stops working. Jackie is a sympathetic person and she has her flaws. Westgate employs thousands of people, what David does, in fact helps people. But on the other side you see how crazy they live and view the world.

The filmmakers re-balance the scales in every scene. They show the humanity and then show the dirt. You feel disgusted by them, then you feel empathy. Two really good examples. David works hard as hell, no doubt. He does earn his money. He figured out how to work the system. But then the guy talks about how he helped George W Bush get elected in 2001. When asked how he did it, he says “I don’t want to say….it might not exactly be legal.” Another one is when they talk to the kids. The adopted girl came from an abusive and very poor family. She compares her life of being dirt poor and her new life of luxury. She talks about trying to stay grounded, think about where she came from and how she dreamed of being rich. “I thought if I was ever rich, I’d wake up with a smile everyday. Now, I’m just used to it.” All the kids are, they’re used to it, they don’t know anything else. Jackie is far and away the worst, a gleeful compulsive shopper. Buying stuff is what she loves to do. She talks about alligator shoes and ostrich feather pants that cost 10 grand, laughs when she said she spent a million dollars a year on just…stuff.

But it could happen to you, which is the main point. When you become successful, your lifestyle and expectations change. It’s human nature. Sitting there saying it would never happen to you, that you would never change is a lie. You wouldn’t be aware it was happening to you. Even with all that money, they’re just people. The Siegel fortune was made solely on credit. No one paid for his business in cash. He got huge, cheap loans to build his resorts. When it all collapsed, the banks turned on David just like they did on everyone else. And he made them millions, if not billions. The banks hounding him to sell everything, refusing to give him extensions or the chance to make a deal. They just wanted to take the real estate from him. Their dream house lays half way finished (it is SO obnoxious, it’s hilarious) after putting $75 million into it. It goes into foreclosure (it’s a tough sell, the amount of people that can afford it is really minuscule, the location makes it an even harder sell).

Fascinating story watching this wealthy family have to adapt to lifestyle changes and stress they never saw coming. It’s enraging, it’s sad and funny. One of the best documentaries I’ve seen in awhile.

The Bourne Legacy is the fourth movie in the Jason Bourne espionage franchise. Big changes were made as Matt Damon bowed out of the series with director Paul Greengrass. It’s been 10 years since the first movie and 5 since the last. With the big cast change, Jeremy Renner plays Aaron Cross, another participant in the deep dark recesses of the Tredstone operation. “Jason wasn’t the only one” is the push here.

There was a lot of trepidation of how this movie would be, but I gotta say it fits and works really well. That is all thanks to writer Tony Gilroy who has been a part of every movie. He knows the characters and world better than anyone and he continues the action and intrigue without missing a beat. He also directs and does a good job of it.

I really like Jeremy Renner and he did well in this role. With Jason blowing cover for his bosses (the beginning of Legacy takes place when Ultimatum is happening), a slash and burn protocol is put into action to scrub all traces of the spy program. Investigations are inevitable and those in charge scramble to protect their asses. Aaron is a bit more special than Jason. While the previous movies were about a super spy remembering who he is, why and for who, Aaron knows he’s in the program. He takes medication that’s given to him, but he’s not entirely in the loop. Following the tag team nature of the previous movies, Rachel Weisz plays Dr. Marta Shearing who also works for the program and is also thrown out with the government bathwater. She knows all about the drugs Aaron was taking and helps him fight back.

Legacy in not only a solid action film, it’s a solid entry to the series. It looks and sounds like a Bourne movie, the action sections are really cool, the suspense and sneakiness is there and at the end of the two hours, I wanted more. That’s always a good sign for me.

Some quick hits!

Abraham Lincoln: Vampire Hunter: This was directed by Timur Bekmambetov who also did Wanted, so crazy action scenes are a known quantity. Abe Lincoln: VA is a fun ‘what if’ idea where Abe Lincoln’s mother is killed by a vampire when he’s a boy and that inspires him to eliminate every single one he can find. Politics become his ‘backup plan’ and the plot weaves together history with vampire lore. It works pretty well, Benjamin Walker is pretty convincing as Abe and he’s really handy with an axe. Action is super over the top comic book style. Lots of style and slow mo. Fun movie, makes a good rental I think.

The Expendables 2: The Action Movie Star supergroup film is back and it’s better than the first. So that helps. The group is brought into a retrieval mission where one of their own is killed. That starts the mission for revenge and the halt of a nuclear threat. So that’s the set up for some good action scenes with action stars from he last 30 years. Problem one: the CG blood is terrible in the opening scene. It looks so bad it’s distracting. It’s toned down and gets better later on, but it’s worth mentioning. Second, there are a ton of stars here, the big get being Arnold Schwarzenegger. It’s enough to have these huge hollywood action stars in one movie, but they had to shoe horn in every catchphrase they could. It doesn’t fit, it’s super obnoxious and just pointless. Everyone knows who these guys are and what they’ve done. Let them me these new characters in this universe. Any worse and Arnold and Bruce Willis would have high fived and looked right at the camera while slinging Terminator and Die Hard lines at the audience.

Men in Black 3: This turned out way better than I thought it would. The second movie was pretty terrible (I think everyone likes the first) and it’s been a long time since Agent J and K have been seen. Here we see one of the meanest aliens (Jemaine Clement!}that K puts into jail breaks out, manages to travel back in time and kill K so that his alien race can invade Earth. It works really well. There is a mix of fantastic special effects (both practical and CG) and terrible blue screen that needed some more time to be lit correctly. Solid cast, Will Smith does his thing, Tommy Lee Jones holds it down the way he does. Josh Brolin is the real star, he plays the young Agent K and he nails a Tommy Lee Jones impression. Check it out, it’s a great sequel.

I’ve been anticipating this James Bond movie for a long time and it completely lived up to my expectations. It’s beautiful, it’s sexy, it’s so damn cool.

Opening Title Sequence – SKYFALL from Exophrine on Vimeo.

Skyfall is the intimate story of James Bond and his espionage world. We see a lot of his past as well as his boss M after the list of NATO secret agents is stolen by the conniving and vicious Silva. The murky depths that M has gone to protect her nation comes bubbling back in disturbing and intense events that she and Bond must face together.

I love this movie from the first frame to the last. The fantastic soundtrack, the gorgeous production design and direction, the perfect theme song by Adele with the jaw dropping title sequence. Skyfall is so well made from every angle, there was incredible love put into this movie. It looks and sounds stunning, the production is just oozing with style and precision to detail. The plot is a mature and surprisingly introspective on Bond and M, the relationship between what is essentially a hired killer and his boss.

There are a ton of nods to the series past while setting up the franchise for the future. Action scenes, while rather infrequent, are superbly done and exciting. With CG only used to enhance or to truly make something too dangerous to do live, possible. There are some spectacular stunts and explosions on display. I was also surprised by the lack of gadgets, but what is there is very plausible and cool.

Along with the terrific script is this outstanding cast. I love Daniel Craig as Bond, this is easily his best yet. Casino Royale was very good and Quantum of Solice is one of the bigger disappointments for me (writing that was bloated and unfocused). Judi Dench is back for her seventh time as M and she is simply fantastic. There is a lot of interaction with her and Bond, they usually just have brief scenes together, but here they have a real partnership. We see that their fates are intertwined, a level of trust and honor that is rarely scene in such genre pictures. They only exist because the other person does. The brilliant Javier Bardem plays Silva, who is far and away the best Bond villain in years, if not decades. A truly scary man with a killer backstory and murderous intent. He pushes Bond and all of MI6 to their limit, I loved watching him devour every scene he was in (a lot of this was due to some fantastic direction, his first scene comes immediately to mind). We get two fantastic Bond girls in this entry, with the beautiful Naomie Harris as Eve (first time I saw her was in 28 Days Later) and the stunning French newcomer Berenice Marlohe as Severine (even her name is cool). We have a new Q as well, played by Ben Winshaw. He’s not seen much, but he’s very memorable and is quickly making a name for himself in cinema.

I can’t really say much more beside glowing praise, I truly loved it. It respects the 50 year old franchise while bringing it to new places. Daniel Craig is signed for two more movies and the foundation for a really incredible run is right in front of us. I have really high hopes, go see this in theaters with a fantastic screen and sound system!

Disney animation has been on a roll! Tangled was a great movie and a huge success and Wreck-It Ralph is even better.

Ralph is the villian in the 80’s videogame “Fix-It Felix Jr.”. Ralph breaks the apartment building while Felix Jr. comes and fixes it. At the end of the level, Ralph is thrown off the roof into the mud below. After 30 years of this, he’s sick of getting the bum rap of being a villian. In an effort to be on equal ground with the “good” guys in his game, he goes off to another game to win a medal to show them how useful and imprtant he is. Trouble insues.

The premises is really smart and very well executed. It’s kinda like the videogame spin of Toy Story. When the arcade closes, the characters can leave their game and visit the others by zipping through the power cables of the games (the hub is in the power strips that the arcade machines are plugged into). There are ton of video game references from start to finish. Half the fun is picking out all of the characters from games that are just milling about in the background.

There’s a lot of heart in this movie, Ralph being voiced by John C Reilly is a brilliant choice. I really like him to start with and he makes Ralph a super relatable and lovable character. He’s upset with his job, upset with who he is in this videogame world. His story is one of discovery of self, meeting other characters who share similar life struggles (Sarah Silverman as Venelopee is a great foil for Ralph, one of the best cartoon duos in quite sometime.). He grows as a character and uses his established skills to solve problems. There is a lot of love and respect in this film, that’s why I really liked it. It also doesn’t hurt that the animation in this movie is exceptional. The characters look and move great, the original video games they came up with are terrific and inspired. Some amazing lighting and texture work, the Sugar Rush game looks like it’s really made of candy.

It can get pretty intense at times for younger viewers, so the PG rating is applicable. Really liked it, terrific work from a studio that isn’t Pixar!